Diaspora
Why some Kenyans living in America are worried as Up to 200,000 asylum seekers face visa revocation

A new immigration policy being prepared by the Trump administration is sending a wave of uncertainty through immigrant communities in the United States, including some Kenyans who entered the country legally on visitor or business visas before seeking asylum.
The United States is preparing to revoke the B-1 and B-2 visas of foreign nationals who entered the country on business or tourist visas and later applied for asylum, according to U.S. government documents and officials cited by major American news organizations.
The potential scale of the action is what has attracted widespread attention.
The Associated Press reported that up to 200,000 visas could eventually be revoked, potentially making it the largest single mass visa revocation in U.S. history. The exact number, however, has not been confirmed by the State Department, which says the revocations will be carried out on a rolling basis and that the number remains dynamic.
For Kenyans living in the United States, the announcement has raised an uncomfortable question: Could people who came to America legally as visitors and subsequently sought asylum now find themselves facing a new immigration crisis?
What the Trump administration is proposing
The policy targets holders of B-1 and B-2 visas.
A B-1 visa is generally used for temporary business travel, while a B-2 visa covers tourism, family visits, medical treatment and similar temporary purposes.
Under the plan, the State Department is expected to identify holders of B-1 and B-2 visas issued between 2016 and 2026 who have subsequently sought asylum in the United States.
The State Department is coordinating with the Department of Homeland Security to identify those individuals and revoke their nonimmigrant visas.
State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott said the administration is targeting foreigners who entered the country claiming to be short-term visitors and subsequently filed asylum applications to remain permanently.
Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau has also criticized what the administration considers fraudulent or “bogus” asylum claims, arguing that asylum should not be used as a way of circumventing U.S. immigration laws.
That argument is at the center of the administration’s justification for the policy.
But immigration law is more complicated than simply saying that someone entered America on a tourist visa and later applied for asylum.
Applying for asylum after entering America is not automatically illegal
This is an important distinction for immigrants to understand.
Under U.S. law, a foreign national who is physically present in the United States can generally apply for asylum if they fear persecution in their home country because of factors such as race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion.
USCIS says a person may apply for asylum regardless of their current immigration status, subject to the applicable legal requirements, including generally filing within one year of arrival.
That means the mere fact that someone entered the United States on a B-1 or B-2 visa and later sought asylum does not, by itself, establish that the person committed fraud.
The circumstances surrounding each person’s visa application and asylum claim matter.
Someone could, for example, enter the United States as a visitor and subsequently decide to seek protection after circumstances change or after becoming convinced that returning home would expose them to persecution.
The administration, however, is taking the position that people who represented themselves as temporary visitors and then used the asylum system to remain permanently should face consequences.
That difference in interpretation could become important if the policy is challenged in court.
Why some Kenyans are nervous
The policy does not specifically target Kenyans.
It is not a Kenya-specific visa ban.
Instead, it applies to foreign nationals who fall within the administration’s stated criteria.
Nevertheless, Kenyans can potentially be affected because the United States has a significant Kenyan immigrant population, and some Kenyans have entered America through temporary visas before pursuing other immigration options.
The uncertainty is particularly relevant to people who have pending asylum applications, families whose immigration situations are complicated, or individuals whose original B-1 or B-2 visas remain part of their immigration history.
For such people, the headline can sound frightening:
“The U.S. is revoking visas of asylum seekers.”
But that headline does not necessarily mean that everyone affected will suddenly be arrested or deported.
According to officials cited by AP, revocation of the visitor visa would not necessarily result in immediate deportation.
People with pending asylum cases could instead be placed into a different immigration category while their cases continue.
That distinction is extremely important.
A visa and legal status are not the same thing
One reason the announcement has created confusion is that many people use the words “visa” and “immigration status” interchangeably.
They are not the same.
A visa generally allows a foreign national to seek entry into the United States for a particular purpose. Once inside the country, a person’s immigration status and any subsequent immigration proceedings become separate legal questions.
Consequently, revoking a B-1 or B-2 visa does not automatically mean that an individual has been ordered removed from the United States.
It can nevertheless have serious consequences.
A person could lose the ability to use that visa for future travel, and the government could take additional immigration action depending on the person’s circumstances.
For anyone with an active asylum or immigration case, the details of that individual case therefore matter enormously.
Why the number 200,000 is attracting attention
The figure of 200,000 should be treated carefully.
It is a potential number, not a confirmed list of 200,000 people who have already been ordered out of America.
The State Department has not confirmed that exactly 200,000 visas will be revoked.
Instead, officials say the process will be conducted on a rolling basis and that the number remains subject to change.
If the maximum estimate materializes, however, it would represent an extraordinary expansion of visa enforcement.
The United States has already revoked more than 175,000 visas since President Donald Trump returned to office, according to figures released by the State Department.
Those revocations have involved a range of circumstances, including people accused or convicted of crimes and individuals whom the administration says violated U.S. immigration or foreign-policy rules.
The proposed asylum-related action would therefore form part of a much broader immigration enforcement campaign.
The Trump administration is tightening immigration rules on multiple fronts
The visa proposal did not emerge in isolation.
The Trump administration has introduced a series of measures intended to make immigration to the United States more restrictive.
These include greater scrutiny of visa applicants, demands for additional information about applicants’ social-media activity, higher costs for some immigration processes and restrictions affecting nationals of certain countries.
The administration has also pursued policies based on concerns that some immigrants could become dependent on public benefits.
Just days before the asylum-related visa announcement, a federal judge in New York struck down a Trump administration policy that had suspended immigrant-visa processing for nationals of 75 countries on public-charge grounds. The judge found that the policy exceeded the secretary of state’s authority.
The decision demonstrates something important about the current immigration environment:
The administration is pushing aggressively, but some of its immigration policies are being challenged in court.
The proposed mass visa revocations could face similar legal scrutiny.
What happens to people whose visas are revoked?
This is perhaps the question causing the greatest concern.
The answer will depend heavily on the individual’s immigration circumstances.
A person with a pending asylum application is not necessarily in the same position as someone whose asylum claim has already been denied.
Likewise, someone with another lawful immigration status may be treated differently from someone whose only immigration basis is a visitor visa.
The administration has not indicated that every person whose B-1 or B-2 visa is revoked will immediately be deported.
AP reported that officials said most people with pending asylum cases would be recategorized but would lose their status as business or tourism travelers.
That means affected immigrants should not automatically interpret a visa-revocation notice as a deportation order.
At the same time, they should not ignore it.
An immigration document from the U.S. government can have significant consequences, and anyone who receives one should consider obtaining professional legal advice.
Why the policy could become a legal battle
The scale of the proposal alone is likely to attract legal challenges.
The administration is essentially arguing that the government can revoke visitor visas from people who used those visas to enter the country before seeking asylum.
Immigration advocates and attorneys could challenge the government’s interpretation of the law, particularly in cases where there is no evidence that the individual lied when applying for the original visa.
That distinction could prove critical.
There is a difference between planning to seek asylum when applying for a tourist visa and later deciding that asylum is necessary after entering the United States.
Whether the government can treat the two situations in the same way could become a major point of legal disagreement.
And recent court decisions show that the administration’s immigration policies are not immune from judicial review.
What this means for Kenyans considering America
For Kenyans outside the United States who are planning to visit, study, work or immigrate, the developments offer another reminder that U.S. immigration rules are becoming increasingly stringent.
A visitor visa should be used for the purpose for which it was granted.
Applicants should provide truthful information and should never assume that a visa guarantees entry into the United States or permanent residence.
At the same time, people should not be discouraged from seeking legitimate legal protection if their circumstances genuinely qualify them for asylum.
The safest approach is to understand the rules before making an immigration decision.
The fear is about more than visas
For many immigrants, the anxiety surrounding the announcement is not simply about losing a piece of paper.
It is about uncertainty.
People who have built lives in the United States may have homes, jobs, children, businesses and communities there.
An immigration policy that potentially affects hundreds of thousands of people can therefore create fear even among people who ultimately may not be affected.
For Kenyans, the message is particularly relevant because immigration to the United States has become an important part of the lives of many families separated between Kenya and America.
A relative in Nairobi may be following the story because a brother, sister, parent or child lives in the United States.
An asylum applicant may be wondering whether their case is still safe.
A visitor may be questioning whether immigration rules could change while they are in America.
And families planning future travel may simply be asking what the increasingly restrictive immigration environment means for them.
What affected immigrants should do
Anyone who believes they could fall within the policy should avoid making decisions based solely on social-media claims or sensational headlines.
The first step is to determine exactly what immigration status they currently hold and whether they have an active asylum or other immigration case.
They should also keep copies of their immigration documents, notices and previous applications.
Most importantly, people with pending immigration cases should consider consulting a qualified U.S. immigration attorney who can review their individual circumstances.
No two cases are necessarily identical.
The bottom line
The proposed action involving up to 200,000 B-1 and B-2 visa holders is significant, but it is important not to confuse visa revocation with automatic deportation.
The administration says it is targeting people who entered the United States as temporary visitors and subsequently sought asylum, arguing that some have abused the immigration system.
Critics are likely to question whether the government can broadly treat such cases as violations, particularly where individuals had legitimate reasons for seeking asylum after entering the country.
For now, the exact number of affected people remains uncertain, and the policy could face legal challenges.
But for Kenyans and other immigrants living in America, the development is another sign of how dramatically the U.S. immigration landscape is changing.
The immediate question for many will not simply be whether their visa remains valid.
It will be whether a decision they made years ago — entering America legally as a visitor — could now affect their future in the country.
Diaspora
Kenyan woman Stella Wamaitha Njoroge says one act of kindness in Dubai changed her life

When Stella Wamaitha Njoroge arrived in Dubai in February 2020, she was 23 years old and hopeful about what lay ahead.
The Kenyan woman had travelled to the United Arab Emirates expecting to find work within weeks and begin building a new life in a city known for attracting people from around the world.
Instead, the biggest global disruption in generations arrived almost immediately after she did.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought businesses, travel and everyday life to a standstill. For Njoroge, who was still trying to establish herself in a new country, the consequences were especially difficult.
Her savings began disappearing.
Then she reached a point where she could no longer afford her rent.
What happened next, according to Njoroge, would become one of the most important experiences of her life in Dubai.
She arrived in Dubai just before the pandemic
Njoroge’s timing could hardly have been more challenging.
The UAE began introducing extensive measures to contain COVID-19 in March 2020. According to the UAE government’s official account of its pandemic response, schools and higher education institutions were closed, distance learning was introduced, shopping centres and entertainment destinations were temporarily closed, new visas were suspended and restrictions were placed on air travel.
The government also introduced measures affecting foreign residents whose visas or work permits were expiring during the disruption. Some residents and visitors received extensions as authorities attempted to deal with the consequences of suspended air traffic and the wider pandemic emergency. (UAE government)
For someone who had arrived only weeks earlier, finding employment in that environment was far more difficult than she had anticipated.
Njoroge later told Emirates 24|7 that she struggled to find work during the lockdown and eventually ran out of money.
Her immediate problem was no longer simply finding a job.
It was keeping a roof over her head.
The conversation she was afraid to have
Njoroge said she became increasingly anxious as her savings disappeared.
Eventually, she had to confront a situation many expatriates fear when living away from home: she could no longer afford her accommodation.
She said she finally gathered the courage to tell her Lebanese landlord that she would not be able to pay the rent and would have to leave.
She had nowhere else to go.
But according to Njoroge, the landlord did not ask her to leave.
Instead, he allowed her to remain in the apartment without paying rent.
For three months, she said, she was able to stay there without paying a dirham.
The decision gave her something she desperately needed at the time: stability.
More importantly, Njoroge says it changed the way she felt about being alone in a foreign country.
In her account to Emirates 24|7, she said that at 23, living abroad during an unprecedented crisis, she felt “seen, supported, and protected.” (Emirates 24|7)
The landlord’s identity was not disclosed in that published account, and the details of the arrangement have not been independently documented in public records. The three-month rent-free period therefore remains Njoroge’s account of what happened.
But for her, the meaning of the experience has never depended simply on the amount of money involved.
She tried to repay him
As her circumstances eventually improved, Njoroge said she tried to repay the landlord.
He refused.
Instead, she said, he told her to pass the kindness on to somebody else who needed help.
That advice stayed with her.
The experience gave Njoroge a different perspective on what it meant to build a life in a country far from home.
She had arrived expecting to find employment and establish herself independently.
The pandemic instead showed her how vulnerable a person could become when circumstances suddenly changed.
It also showed her how much difference one person’s decision could make.
Njoroge later described the experience as something that changed her completely.
Rather than treating the landlord’s generosity as a debt that could only be settled financially, she began thinking about kindness as something that could be transferred from one person to another.
From a young newcomer to a business adviser
Njoroge eventually managed to build a career in Dubai.
Today, her professional profile describes her as a business setup consultant and UAE visa specialist with more than five years of experience. Her work involves helping people establish businesses and navigate aspects of the UAE’s immigration and business environment. (Stella Wamaitha’s professional profile)
The work has particular relevance for Africans looking to establish themselves in the UAE.
People arriving in the country to work, invest or start businesses may have to navigate licensing, immigration, residency and other administrative requirements.
The UAE has developed numerous routes for foreign entrepreneurs and investors.
The government’s official business guidance explains the steps involved in establishing a mainland company, including choosing a business activity, determining the appropriate legal form, selecting a trade name and obtaining the required approvals and licence. (UAE government business setup guide)
The country also offers residence options for eligible investors and entrepreneurs, including the Green residence system for certain categories of investors, business partners, freelancers and self-employed people. (UAE government residence information)
For Njoroge, learning how to navigate that environment eventually became part of her profession.
The woman who once arrived in Dubai struggling to find her first job now helps other people understand how to establish themselves in the country.
Her own experience became part of her expertise
Njoroge has said that her professional journey was shaped partly by her own experience trying to understand the UAE’s business and visa environment.
In a professional reflection published on LinkedIn, she described learning the system herself after encountering uncertainty and conflicting information.
Over time, that knowledge became something she could offer to others.
Her current professional profile identifies her work with Easy Business SetUp Dubai and describes her experience in business setup consulting and UAE visa services. (Stella Wamaitha on LinkedIn)
That evolution gives her story an unusual arc.
She did not arrive in Dubai as an established consultant.
She arrived as a 23-year-old newcomer trying to find work.
The pandemic interrupted those plans.
A landlord gave her time when she could no longer pay rent.
She eventually recovered, built professional experience and developed a career helping other people navigate the same country in which she had once been a newcomer.
Dubai became more than a place to work
The experience with her landlord also appears to have influenced how Njoroge understands community.
Dubai is home to a highly international population, and Njoroge says some of her most meaningful relationships have been with people from backgrounds completely different from her own.
In her interview with Emirates 24|7, she described herself as intentional about meeting people from different cultures and building relationships.
Those connections have extended beyond the UAE.
She recalled travelling to Egypt for her birthday and reconnecting with an Egyptian friend she had met while he was living and working in Dubai. The friend collected her from the airport, showed her around Cairo and eventually welcomed her into his family home.
For Njoroge, the experience demonstrated how friendships built in Dubai could continue long after people left the city.
She described those relationships as creating a kind of international family.
That idea is central to the way she now talks about her life in the UAE.
For people who move abroad without relatives nearby, friendships can become an important source of practical and emotional support.
Njoroge’s own experience gave her a particularly personal understanding of that reality.
Paying the kindness forward
The lesson she says she learned from her landlord eventually developed into something bigger than helping individuals informally.
Njoroge began looking at how she could create opportunities for other African women in business.
She told Emirates 24|7 that she had previously attended a high-end networking event where she was the only African woman in the room.
The experience was intimidating, she said, but she decided to introduce herself and speak to people.
That decision eventually led her to a mentor who invested in her business and opened professional doors for her.
The experience made her think about what might happen if other African women had greater access to similar networks.
She Means Business Network
In 2025, Njoroge and her friend Joan Mwende co-founded the She Means Business Network in Dubai, according to Njoroge’s account published by Emirates 24|7.
The network focuses on African women and women of colour who are professionals, entrepreneurs or transitioning into business.
According to Njoroge, the group organizes events, panels and networking sessions designed to improve visibility and access to opportunities.
When Emirates 24|7 profiled Njoroge in May 2026, she said the network had about 100 registered members. (Emirates 24|7 profile of Njoroge and the network)
The network represents a significant shift from where Njoroge was during the early months of the pandemic.
In 2020, she was worried about whether she could afford her next month’s accommodation.
Several years later, she was helping create professional connections for other women seeking to build careers and businesses.
Why networks matter for people living abroad
Moving to another country can involve much more than securing a job.
Newcomers often have to learn unfamiliar administrative systems, develop professional contacts and build personal relationships from scratch.
For entrepreneurs, the challenge can be even greater.
The UAE has deliberately positioned itself as a destination for international investment and entrepreneurship, with government initiatives designed to simplify business formation and support small and medium-sized enterprises.
In June 2026, Dubai’s Department of Economy and Tourism launched “SME in a Box,” a platform intended to bring services such as licensing support, banking, payments, logistics and telecommunications into a more integrated onboarding process for entrepreneurs. (Dubai Department of Economy and Tourism)
That official push illustrates the broader environment in which Njoroge now works.
The country continues to attract people who want to establish companies, relocate, invest or build careers.
But official systems are only one part of successfully settling into a new country.
People also need information, contacts and trusted guidance.
That is where Njoroge has built her professional niche.
A different kind of repayment
The landlord who helped Njoroge during the pandemic may never have expected his decision to have consequences years later.
According to her account, he simply gave a young woman some time when she was struggling financially.
He did not ask her to repay the money when she later offered to do so.
Instead, he told her to help somebody else.
That instruction appears to have become one of the guiding ideas of her life in Dubai.
Njoroge’s response has not been limited to one individual.
Her career helps people navigate business setup and visa-related matters.
Her professional network connects her with entrepreneurs and newcomers.
And the She Means Business Network is intended to give African women access to professional relationships and opportunities.
In that sense, the kindness she received has been passed forward in several different forms.
Her story reflects the uncertainty of starting over abroad
Njoroge’s story is ultimately about more than a landlord waiving rent.
It is about what can happen when someone’s carefully constructed plans collide with circumstances beyond their control.
She arrived in Dubai in February 2020 expecting to find a job.
A few weeks later, a global pandemic had disrupted the economic environment around her.
The UAE government introduced restrictions that affected travel, businesses, education and immigration. For new arrivals without established support networks, the uncertainty could be particularly difficult. (UAE government COVID-19 measures)
Njoroge’s own savings eventually ran out.
She was faced with the prospect of leaving her home.
Then, according to her account, her landlord gave her three months.
Those three months did not solve every problem she faced.
But they bought her time.
And sometimes time is exactly what a person needs to change the direction of a difficult situation.
From vulnerability to helping others
There is a striking contrast between Njoroge’s life in the first months after arriving in Dubai and the work she does today.
At 23, she was trying to find a job while watching her savings disappear.
Today, she works in business setup and UAE visa consulting.
She has built an international professional network.
She has helped establish a community for African women in business.
And she speaks openly about the importance of building relationships with people from different backgrounds.
Her professional profile now describes a career that would have been difficult to imagine during those early months of 2020. (Stella Wamaitha’s professional profile)
Her experience also illustrates how careers can emerge from unexpected circumstances.
The pandemic disrupted the plan she originally had.
But the life she eventually built in Dubai grew in a different direction.
The meaning of one small act
Stories about migration often focus on jobs, salaries, visas, businesses and the practical reasons people leave one country for another.
Njoroge’s story highlights something less tangible.
Sometimes the difference between feeling completely alone and feeling capable of carrying on can be one person’s decision to help.
For her, that decision came from a landlord at a moment when she was unable to pay rent.
The help lasted three months.
The memory has lasted years.
And the lesson she says she took from it has become part of how she approaches other people.
When she later tried to repay her landlord, he reportedly told her to pass the kindness to somebody else.
She appears to have taken those words seriously.
Today, she helps people navigate the UAE’s business environment and works to connect African women with professional opportunities.
The connection between those things is not simply financial.
It is the idea that support creates a chain.
One person helps another person stay afloat.
That person eventually becomes strong enough to help someone else.
A young woman who found a different future
Njoroge arrived in Dubai with a simple ambition: find work and build a future.
The pandemic temporarily took that opportunity away.
Her savings disappeared, her employment plans were disrupted and she reached a point where she feared she would have to leave her home.
But according to her account, someone chose to give her an alternative.
Three months of rent-free accommodation gave her enough space to get through one of the most uncertain periods of her life.
Years later, she is no longer the young woman wondering whether she can afford her next month’s rent.
She is a business setup adviser, a member of Dubai’s international professional community and a co-founder of a network seeking to help African women access opportunities.
Her story is therefore not simply about surviving the pandemic.
It is about what happened afterward.
A difficult experience became a lesson.
A lesson became a philosophy.
And that philosophy became part of the way she works with other people.
For Njoroge, the kindness of one landlord during the darkest period of her early life in Dubai appears to have changed the way she thinks about success.
Success is not only about getting ahead.
It can also mean remembering who helped you when you were struggling — and finding a way to help somebody else when your circumstances eventually allow it.
That is the legacy Njoroge says she chose to carry forward.
A young Kenyan woman arrived in Dubai hoping to build a new life.
The city gave her unexpected challenges.
One person gave her a place to stay when she had nowhere else to go.
And years later, she is trying to create opportunities for others.
Sometimes, a life-changing act of kindness does not end with the person who receives it.
Sometimes, it keeps moving.
Diaspora
DHS proposes $70,000 fee for international students seeking U.S. work experience

The Trump administration is proposing a dramatic new fee on the Optional Practical Training program used by international students to gain work experience in the United States, with the Department of Homeland Security seeking to charge schools $70,000 for a student’s initial participation and $30,000 for subsequent participation.
The proposal, released by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Wednesday and scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on Oct. 8, would apply the charges to schools certified to enroll F-1 international students. The fee would have to be paid before a school’s designated official could recommend a student for OPT. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The proposal is not a $70,000 bill that the government would directly send to each student. The regulatory text places the payment obligation on the educational institution. DHS says, however, that schools could potentially seek outside funding, including contributions from employers or other organizations. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
What the proposed fee would cover
OPT allows F-1 students to undertake employment related to their field of study during or after their academic program. Under current rules, students can generally receive up to 12 months of OPT at each educational level. Eligible STEM graduates can receive an additional 24-month extension, for as much as three years of post-completion practical training.
Under the proposed rule, the first OPT recommendation for an F-1 student would trigger the $70,000 payment, regardless of whether the student uses pre-completion or post-completion OPT. A later OPT recommendation would trigger the $30,000 charge. DHS specifically says the subsequent fee would also apply to STEM OPT. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The proposal therefore could result in $100,000 in fees for a student who receives an initial OPT authorization and later uses a STEM OPT extension.
DHS estimates that between 88,374 and 194,554 students could participate annually in OPT under different scenarios, while STEM OPT participation could range from 74,088 to 95,384 students. Based on those assumptions, the department estimates annual fee collections of between $8.4 billion and $16.5 billion, with a primary estimate of $12.4 billion. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
Those figures are estimates, not expected collections under a finalized policy. DHS acknowledges that the size of the proposed fees could substantially reduce participation and says it cannot confidently predict how many schools would continue recommending students for OPT. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
DHS says the proposal targets fraud and program abuse
DHS says the fees are intended to combat fraud, strengthen the immigration system and protect U.S. workers. The proposal points to previous investigations involving fraudulent OPT employment arrangements, including cases involving purported employers and worksites that did not actually provide the jobs represented to immigration authorities. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The department cites an ICE investigation in Northern Virginia in which officials said they found evidence of nonfunctional or staged worksites and supervisors who were unfamiliar with requirements for employing foreign students. DHS also refers to a 2026 investigation involving more than 10,000 F-1 students associated with employers it characterized as highly suspect. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
DHS also argues that the expansion of STEM OPT has created a substantial employment pathway outside the congressionally capped H-1B system. The proposed rule notes that 165,524 F-1 students participated in STEM OPT in 2024, compared with the annual statutory H-1B cap. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The administration’s rationale is therefore broader than simply raising revenue: the rule describes the fees as a mechanism intended to discourage fraudulent or inappropriate use of OPT and to reduce what DHS considers an avenue for bypassing other employment-based immigration restrictions. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
Colleges could face substantial costs
The financial responsibility would fall initially on institutions rather than directly on students. DHS identified 2,478 schools that enrolled F-1 students who participated in OPT during the 2022-24 period and treated them as the population potentially affected by the proposal. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The department’s own analysis illustrates how large the financial exposure could become. It estimates that 1,389 small institutions could be affected and that, after the transition period, 98 of them could face maximum annual fee impacts exceeding 20% of their estimated annual revenue if historical OPT participation continued. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
That analysis assumes historical participation patterns continue even after the fees are imposed. DHS separately acknowledges that the proposed charges could cause institutions to reduce the number of students they recommend for OPT. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The broader higher-education consequences could extend beyond OPT revenue itself. NAFSA, an association representing international educators, estimates that international students contributed $42.9 billion to the U.S. economy and supported more than 355,000 jobs during the 2024-25 academic year. Its latest projections, which do not include students on OPT, estimate that a potential decline of up to 111,000 international students could reduce economic contributions by as much as $3.4 billion. Those are NAFSA’s estimates, rather than government forecasts.
The proposal comes with a relatively short public-comment window
One detail in the initial account of the proposal requires correction.
The public-comment period is 30 days, according to the proposed rule. A separate 60-day period applies to comments concerning the information-collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
The proposal is not yet a final rule. DHS says it will consider public comments and may change the rule before issuing a final version. Under the proposed text, the fees would apply prospectively to OPT recommendations dated on or after the rule’s effective date. The proposed transition language specifies an effective period beginning 60 days after publication of a final rule. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
For readers who want to examine the underlying material, the most important documents are the DHS/ICE proposed rule in the Federal Register record, ICE’s official explanation of OPT and STEM OPT requirements, and USCIS’s current fee schedule for employment authorization applications.
What happens next
The proposal will now enter the federal rulemaking process. Universities, students, employers and other interested parties can submit comments addressing the fee levels, DHS’s legal authority, the economic assumptions and the practical consequences of requiring institutions to make payments of tens of thousands of dollars before recommending students for employment authorization.
The proposal itself acknowledges that its effects are difficult to predict. DHS expects some institutions and students to change their behavior in response to the cost, but the department says it cannot reliably quantify the resulting reduction in OPT participation. (Federal Register Public Inspection)
That uncertainty is likely to be central to the debate over the proposal: the administration says the fees are necessary to address fraud, immigration-system integrity and protection of U.S. workers, while the practical effect will depend heavily on whether universities continue to absorb the cost, shift some or all of it elsewhere, or stop recommending some students for OPT.
Diaspora
U.S. Delays 2027 Green Card Lottery Registration as New Rules Add Costs and Passport Requirement

U.S. Delays 2027 Green Card Lottery Registration as New Rules Add Costs and Passport Requirement
WASHINGTON D.C. — Prospective immigrants from Kenya and other eligible African countries are facing an uncertain wait for the next U.S. Diversity Visa lottery after the Department of State delayed the opening of the 2027 registration period and introduced new requirements for applicants.
The State Department has not yet announced the opening or closing dates for DV-2027 registration. It said in November 2025 that it was making changes to the entry process and would announce the registration date “as soon as practicable.” The department also said the delay would not change the visa application period for people selected in the program, which is scheduled to run from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027.
State Department: Changes to the DV-2027 Entry Period
That means reports that the DV-2027 registration window has already been shortened should be treated with caution. No official registration duration has been published by the State Department as of September 29, 2026.
The delay comes as the department implements two significant changes: a $1 registration fee and a new requirement that most applicants provide information from a valid, unexpired passport and upload a scan of the passport’s biographical and signature page.
New $1 fee for lottery registration
A State Department final rule published in September 2025 established a $1 fee for registering for the Diversity Visa lottery. The department said the charge is intended to shift some of the costs of operating the lottery—including maintaining the electronic entry system, storing data, conducting the randomized selection process and performing security reviews—to people entering the lottery.
Federal Register: Diversity Visa Program Fee
The fee is separate from the visa application fee paid later by people who are selected and proceed with the immigration process.
The department’s subsequent Diversity Visa rule makes clear that the $1 fee will be collected when an entrant submits the lottery registration. No waiver is provided for the registration fee.
Federal Register: DV-2027 Passport Requirement and Entry Changes
Applicants should therefore be cautious about websites or agents claiming to offer an official DV-2027 registration before the State Department announces the registration period. The department’s official Diversity Visa entry instructions state that entries must be submitted electronically during the designated period and that there is only one permitted entry per person.
Passport requirement creates a new hurdle
The more consequential change for many prospective applicants is the passport requirement.
Under a final rule implementing changes for DV-2027, applicants generally must provide information from a valid, unexpired passport and upload a scan of its biographical and signature page when registering. The State Department said the requirement is intended to combat fraudulent and duplicate entries and allow earlier identity verification.
Federal Register: DV-2027 Passport Requirement and Entry Changes
The department acknowledged that obtaining a passport can present financial and logistical difficulties, particularly in countries where passport processing is slow or services are difficult to access.
Its regulatory analysis estimated that obtaining and supplying the passport information would add time and costs for applicants. The department estimated the average passport cost across eligible countries at $74.43, while also noting that actual costs and additional expenses vary by country.
The rule contains limited exemptions, including certain stateless applicants, some nationals of Communist-controlled countries who cannot obtain passports from their governments, and people covered by specified government-approved waivers. Applicants seeking an exemption must provide supporting evidence.
The State Department has said the passport rule will apply globally rather than specifically targeting African applicants. It nevertheless acknowledged that people without passports could be deterred from entering the program.
Kenya remains an eligible country
Kenyan-born applicants have been among the beneficiaries of the Diversity Visa program in recent years.
Kenya was listed among the African countries eligible for DV-2026, while Nigeria was among the countries excluded from that year’s program because of the statutory high-admission formula.
State Department: DV-2026 Instructions
The State Department selected 3,949 Kenyan entrants for DV-2026. The figure includes selected entrants and their eligible derivatives and does not mean that all of those people ultimately received visas.
State Department: DV-2026 Selected Entrants
Other African countries also recorded substantial numbers of DV-2026 selectees, including Ethiopia, Egypt, Cameroon, Morocco, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Ghana.
Eligibility for DV-2027, however, must be confirmed against the official instructions when they are issued. A country’s eligibility can change from one program year to another under the statutory formula.
What applicants should expect
For now, the most important fact for prospective DV-2027 applicants is that there is no confirmed registration deadline to work toward.
The State Department has said it will publish the registration dates and the date on which DV-2027 selection results will become available through the Electronic Diversity Visa system.
State Department: Changes to the DV-2027 Entry Period
Once registration opens, applicants will have to comply with the new requirements, including the $1 payment and, in most cases, submission of valid passport information and a passport scan.
The official State Department DV entry guidance remains the appropriate source for registration instructions. The department says the registration system does not become active until the officially specified date and warns applicants to retain their confirmation number after submitting an entry.
The Federal Register rule on passport requirements provides the legal details of the new DV-2027 entry requirements, while the State Department’s DV-2027 announcement is the authoritative source for the delayed registration schedule.
A separate issue for current DV applicants
The DV-2027 delay is occurring alongside continuing uncertainty for people selected in the previous lottery.
In August 2026, the State Department announced that it was again pausing issuance of Diversity Visas while reviewing screening and vetting procedures. The department said applicants could continue submitting applications and attending interviews, but that no Diversity Visas would be issued while the pause was in effect.
State Department: Diversity Visa Issuance Guidance
That development concerns DV-2026 selectees, rather than people waiting to register for DV-2027, and should not be conflated with the delayed registration schedule.
For prospective applicants in Kenya and elsewhere in Africa, the immediate task is therefore preparation rather than rushing to meet an unannounced deadline. The registration dates, eligible-country list and complete DV-2027 instructions must come from the State Department before applicants can know the precise requirements and timeframe.
Tech1 year agoVIDEO: iPhone 17 Air Leak Reveals Ultra-Thin Design: A Bold Leap Beyond the iPhone 16 Pro
News1 year agoHow U.S. Remittance 5% Tax Bill Could Impact Kenyan Diaspora: What You Need to Know
Tech1 year agoMotorola Launches $1,300 Razr Ultra Foldable Smartphone with AI Features, Swarovski-Enhanced Earbuds
Insurance Basics1 year agoPopular Apps May Be Secretly Tracking Your Driving – And Raising Your Insurance Rates
Tech1 year agoMotorola Razr Ultra (2025) Launches With Free 1TB Storage Upgrade
News1 year agoWhat would you do if your Gold Digger girlfriend behaved like this?
News1 year agoBox Office: ‘Sinners’ Holds No. 1 Spot With $13M Friday; ‘The Accountant 2’ Debuts With $9.4M
Insurance Basics1 year agoFlorida House Passes ‘Pam Rock Act’ Requiring Dog Registry and $100K Liability Insurance

















