Connect with us

News

Democrats Demand USCIS Withdraw Controversial Green Card Guidance

Published

on

Spread the love

Congressional Democrats are urging the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to withdraw a controversial policy memorandum that changes how immigration officers evaluate green card applications filed from within the United States, arguing that the guidance conflicts with federal immigration law and decades of established practice.

In a letter sent to USCIS Director Joseph Edlow, Democratic lawmakers objected to USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199, issued on May 21, 2026. The letter, which can be read on the official U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee website, argues that the agency has improperly altered how adjustment of status applications are evaluated without any change in federal law.

Official Senate letter: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/finalized_letter_to_edlow_re_adjustment_of_status.pdf

What Has Changed?

Adjustment of status allows eligible non-citizens already living legally in the United States to apply for permanent residence without leaving the country for visa processing abroad.

Under the new USCIS guidance, immigration officers are instructed to treat adjustment of status as an “extraordinary form of relief” and are encouraged to favor immigrant visa processing through U.S. consulates overseas unless applicants demonstrate compelling reasons to remain in the United States while their applications are processed.

The complete USCIS policy memorandum is available on the agency’s official website:

USCIS Policy Memorandum PM-602-0199: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/policy-manual-updates/20260521-AOSDiscretion.pdf

Although the Immigration and Nationality Act has not changed, Democratic lawmakers argue the memorandum effectively creates new barriers through administrative policy rather than legislation passed by Congress.

Democrats Say USCIS Is Misinterpreting Immigration Law

The lawmakers argue Congress intentionally created adjustment of status so that eligible immigrants already lawfully present in the United States could become permanent residents without the disruption, expense and uncertainty of returning overseas for consular processing.

READ ALSO  Trump Administration Proposes Massive 80% Hike to US Citizenship Fees: What It Means for the Kenyan Diaspora

In their letter, they directly reject the memorandum’s statement that adjustment of status “is a matter of discretion and administrative grace not designed to supersede the regular consular processing of immigrant visas.”

They describe that interpretation as inconsistent with congressional intent and decades of immigration practice.

The full congressional letter is available here:

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/finalized_letter_to_edlow_re_adjustment_of_status.pdf

Students, Workers and Researchers Could Be Affected

Lawmakers warn that the new guidance could have significant consequences for thousands of people already living legally in the United States, including:

  • International students
  • Temporary foreign workers
  • Researchers
  • Professionals holding dual-intent visas
  • Others seeking permanent residence while remaining in the United States

Critics say requiring more applicants to complete processing abroad could interrupt employment, education, research projects and family life.

The Democrats also point to language in the memorandum stating that lawful immigration status alone does not guarantee a favorable exercise of discretion, arguing that the standard is vague and could lead to inconsistent decisions.

Why This Matters

The dispute reflects a broader disagreement over how immigration laws should be administered.

The Trump administration has maintained that temporary visas are intended primarily for temporary stays and should not automatically serve as pathways to permanent residence.

Democratic lawmakers, however, argue that Congress already established adjustment of status as the preferred mechanism for many eligible immigrants already inside the United States, and that any significant changes should come through legislation—not agency guidance.

What Happens Next?

The lawmakers have asked USCIS to withdraw the memorandum, restore previous adjudication practices and explain the legal basis for the policy shift.

READ ALSO  Kenyan Woman Detained by ICE After 14 Years of Complying With Immigration Check-Ins

As of publication, USCIS has not announced any plans to rescind or modify the guidance.

Readers can review the primary documents themselves:


News

Thank You Note From Mr Njau Waira’s Family

Published

on

Spread the love

Dear Family and Friends,

We wish to express our deepest and most sincere gratitude for your overwhelming support throughout this difficult journey of laying to rest our beloved Njau Waira.

Thank you for your financial and material contributions, prayers, calls, messages, and, most importantly, your presence during the funeral arrangements, the wake, the memorial and the finally the burial. Your generosity and commitment made it possible for us to meet our target and give Njau the befitting send-off he deserved.

We are truly humbled and grateful for standing with the family every step of the way.

Your love,❤️ support, kindness and presence will forever be remembered.

May God bless you all abundantly and meet you at the point of need, an ever present help in time of trouble. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

From Waira Family.

READ ALSO  Kenyan Woman Detained by ICE After 14 Years of Complying With Immigration Check-Ins
Continue Reading

Diaspora

U.S. Delays 2027 Green Card Lottery Registration as New Rules Add Costs and Passport Requirement

Published

on

Spread the love

U.S. Delays 2027 Green Card Lottery Registration as New Rules Add Costs and Passport Requirement

WASHINGTON D.C. — Prospective immigrants from Kenya and other eligible African countries are facing an uncertain wait for the next U.S. Diversity Visa lottery after the Department of State delayed the opening of the 2027 registration period and introduced new requirements for applicants.

The State Department has not yet announced the opening or closing dates for DV-2027 registration. It said in November 2025 that it was making changes to the entry process and would announce the registration date “as soon as practicable.” The department also said the delay would not change the visa application period for people selected in the program, which is scheduled to run from October 1, 2026, through September 30, 2027.

State Department: Changes to the DV-2027 Entry Period

That means reports that the DV-2027 registration window has already been shortened should be treated with caution. No official registration duration has been published by the State Department as of September 29, 2026.

The delay comes as the department implements two significant changes: a $1 registration fee and a new requirement that most applicants provide information from a valid, unexpired passport and upload a scan of the passport’s biographical and signature page.

New $1 fee for lottery registration

A State Department final rule published in September 2025 established a $1 fee for registering for the Diversity Visa lottery. The department said the charge is intended to shift some of the costs of operating the lottery—including maintaining the electronic entry system, storing data, conducting the randomized selection process and performing security reviews—to people entering the lottery.

READ ALSO  Kenya’s Startup Ecosystem Gains Global Attention as Bloomberg Spotlights Emerging Innovators

Federal Register: Diversity Visa Program Fee

The fee is separate from the visa application fee paid later by people who are selected and proceed with the immigration process.

The department’s subsequent Diversity Visa rule makes clear that the $1 fee will be collected when an entrant submits the lottery registration. No waiver is provided for the registration fee.

Federal Register: DV-2027 Passport Requirement and Entry Changes

Applicants should therefore be cautious about websites or agents claiming to offer an official DV-2027 registration before the State Department announces the registration period. The department’s official Diversity Visa entry instructions state that entries must be submitted electronically during the designated period and that there is only one permitted entry per person.

Passport requirement creates a new hurdle

The more consequential change for many prospective applicants is the passport requirement.

Under a final rule implementing changes for DV-2027, applicants generally must provide information from a valid, unexpired passport and upload a scan of its biographical and signature page when registering. The State Department said the requirement is intended to combat fraudulent and duplicate entries and allow earlier identity verification.

Federal Register: DV-2027 Passport Requirement and Entry Changes

The department acknowledged that obtaining a passport can present financial and logistical difficulties, particularly in countries where passport processing is slow or services are difficult to access.

Its regulatory analysis estimated that obtaining and supplying the passport information would add time and costs for applicants. The department estimated the average passport cost across eligible countries at $74.43, while also noting that actual costs and additional expenses vary by country.

READ ALSO  Kenyan Man Oscar Agola Missing in Russia After Military Training: Family Pleads for Answers

The rule contains limited exemptions, including certain stateless applicants, some nationals of Communist-controlled countries who cannot obtain passports from their governments, and people covered by specified government-approved waivers. Applicants seeking an exemption must provide supporting evidence.

The State Department has said the passport rule will apply globally rather than specifically targeting African applicants. It nevertheless acknowledged that people without passports could be deterred from entering the program.

Kenya remains an eligible country

Kenyan-born applicants have been among the beneficiaries of the Diversity Visa program in recent years.

Kenya was listed among the African countries eligible for DV-2026, while Nigeria was among the countries excluded from that year’s program because of the statutory high-admission formula.

State Department: DV-2026 Instructions

The State Department selected 3,949 Kenyan entrants for DV-2026. The figure includes selected entrants and their eligible derivatives and does not mean that all of those people ultimately received visas.

State Department: DV-2026 Selected Entrants

Other African countries also recorded substantial numbers of DV-2026 selectees, including Ethiopia, Egypt, Cameroon, Morocco, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Ghana.

Eligibility for DV-2027, however, must be confirmed against the official instructions when they are issued. A country’s eligibility can change from one program year to another under the statutory formula.

What applicants should expect

For now, the most important fact for prospective DV-2027 applicants is that there is no confirmed registration deadline to work toward.

The State Department has said it will publish the registration dates and the date on which DV-2027 selection results will become available through the Electronic Diversity Visa system.

READ ALSO  Kenyan Woman Explains Why She Had to Marry Within 90 Days of Moving to the U.S. on K-1 Fiancé Visa

State Department: Changes to the DV-2027 Entry Period

Once registration opens, applicants will have to comply with the new requirements, including the $1 payment and, in most cases, submission of valid passport information and a passport scan.

The official State Department DV entry guidance remains the appropriate source for registration instructions. The department says the registration system does not become active until the officially specified date and warns applicants to retain their confirmation number after submitting an entry.

The Federal Register rule on passport requirements provides the legal details of the new DV-2027 entry requirements, while the State Department’s DV-2027 announcement is the authoritative source for the delayed registration schedule.

A separate issue for current DV applicants

The DV-2027 delay is occurring alongside continuing uncertainty for people selected in the previous lottery.

In August 2026, the State Department announced that it was again pausing issuance of Diversity Visas while reviewing screening and vetting procedures. The department said applicants could continue submitting applications and attending interviews, but that no Diversity Visas would be issued while the pause was in effect.

State Department: Diversity Visa Issuance Guidance

That development concerns DV-2026 selectees, rather than people waiting to register for DV-2027, and should not be conflated with the delayed registration schedule.

For prospective applicants in Kenya and elsewhere in Africa, the immediate task is therefore preparation rather than rushing to meet an unannounced deadline. The registration dates, eligible-country list and complete DV-2027 instructions must come from the State Department before applicants can know the precise requirements and timeframe.

Continue Reading

News

Kenyan Senator Denies Link to Viral Underwear Saga as Kirinyaga Political Row Escalates

Published

on

Spread the love

KIRINYAGA, Kenya — Kirinyaga Senator James Kamau Murango has denied any involvement in a viral controversy surrounding women’s underwear bearing his name and the branding of the National Government Affirmative Action Fund (NGAAF).

The controversy gained momentum this week after photographs and videos of the items circulated widely on social media, with some reports linking the merchandise to Murango’s political activities.

Murango has, however, rejected the claims, saying he neither authorised nor participated in the production, purchase or distribution of the items.

According to The Star, the senator’s lawyers, Sakimpa & Partners Advocates, issued a demand for corrections and retractions from media outlets that linked him to the merchandise.

The lawyers said Murango did not print, procure, purchase, supply or distribute the underwear and had not authorised the use of his name or NGAAF branding.

The legal response followed the circulation of videos and photographs that sparked intense discussion online and in Kirinyaga.

Njeri Maina Also Distances Herself

Kirinyaga Woman Representative Njeri Maina has also denied involvement in the distribution of the controversial items.

Maina has called for people allegedly using the names of political leaders without authorisation to be reported to the police.

In a report published on September 27, The Star reported that Maina urged residents to report individuals distributing items while claiming they originated from political leaders’ offices.

The controversy has also drawn attention to the use of NGAAF branding. The fund is associated with the office of the Woman Representative, making the appearance of the branding on the merchandise another point of contention.

READ ALSO  Airtel Kenya Enters Home Fibre Market with Xstream Service, Challenging Safaricom and Zuku in Broadband Push

At this stage, public reports have not established who commissioned or distributed the underwear.

Controversy Comes Ahead of 2027

The dispute comes as political activity in Kirinyaga begins to intensify ahead of the 2027 General Election.

Murango is positioning himself for the Kirinyaga gubernatorial contest, with the political landscape in the county expected to become increasingly competitive following Governor Anne Waiguru’s decision not to seek another term.

The Star reported earlier this month that Waiguru’s planned exit has opened the field for politicians seeking to succeed her.

The underwear controversy has consequently generated additional political attention, particularly because Murango’s name appears on the merchandise.

However, the senator’s denial means that the circumstances surrounding the production and distribution of the items remain disputed.

For now, Murango maintains that he had no role in the campaign merchandise and has threatened further legal and regulatory action against publications that continue to associate him with the items.

The unfolding dispute is likely to remain a talking point in Kirinyaga as political campaigns and public mobilisation gather pace ahead of the 2027 elections.

Continue Reading

Trending